CRM Trainers & Covid-19
On-line Refresher Training
We are currently in extreme circumstances, which are likely to continue for an extended period.
Airlines are suffering major problems, not the least of which will be maintaining the validity of their various instructors in order to be in a position to ramp up training once the crisis has passed.
At ITS Academy, in order to maintain validity for CRM Trainers, we can deliver EASA compliant, on-line CRM Trainer Refresher courses (CRMT-R), for a limited period only, to support our clients at this time.
We realise this might seem an unusual suggestion, and of course we recognise that classroom training is the best possible solution; however, to put this into context:
Whilst there may be an implicit expectation for classroom CRMT-R training within AMC3 ORO.FC.115, there is no specific requirement for it.
The only specific requirement for a CRMT-R in AMC3 ORO.FC.115 is that ‘the refresher training of flight crew CRM trainers should include new methodologies, procedures and lessons learned.’ These are items that can be readily discussed in a conference video call.
CRMT-R courses involve working with experienced CRM Trainers who are required to refresh and update their knowledge and skills on a tri-annual basis. They therefore already have a fundamental understanding and knowledge of the subject matter, and the means/skills of delivering training in the classroom.
You may be interested to hear that the Regulator for one of our European clients has approved on-line recurrent CRM Crew Training for a limited period. We have very successfully delivered the first courses, using sophisticated software which incorporates:
- The inclusion of multiple participants from either a single venue, or from multiple international venues.
- Our instructor can, for example:
- Deliver a standard PowerPoint presentation to all participants
- Run videos
- Run case studies, having previously emailed content and details to all participants
- Run exercises
- Include a whiteboard facility whereby the instructor can make contemporaneous notes available to all participants, or on which any one participant can make notes available for the instructor and other participants
- Send questions or text to any one individual without them being available to others
- Interact with a single participant, groups, or the entire ‘class’
For an on-line CRMT-R course we will ask all participants to submit, in advance of the course, any/all of the following (all of which for a normal ground-based CRMT-R we ask participants to bring to the classroom):
- Any issues, topics or subjects on which they may feel additional support, assistance, or further information would be beneficial.
- Any new ideas, exercises, tasks or supporting resources they feel the other participants might benefit from.
- For our clients when, for any reason, we are unable to make a research visit before preparing courseware for any type of CRM course, we already use an on-line platform to submit questionnaires to the company, and to the participants, in order that we can gain the best possible information about their operation. These questionnaires will be adapted and used for an on-line CRMT-R.
At ITS Academy, we remain committed to supporting our clients in any way possible.
If you would like to receive additional information about our online CRM Trainer refresher courses, or if you would like to make a reservation for yourself or your company, please contact us.Read More
How can Human Factors affect the profitability of your company?
Human factors will have a significant impact on the efficiency, customer retention, and profitability of your business.
For almost 30 years ITS Academy has been working with some of the world’s largest airlines (and some of the smallest!). In fact, we have around 400 clients in more than 70 countries. We have also worked within the rail and medical environments.
The single focus over this period has been to minimise incidents and accidents in clients’ operations by improving safety through reducing human error. Of course, an added bonus is that by reducing error, efficiency and profitability can be improved.
So how can this be achieved?
Well, aviation is a high-risk business and there are many elements within an operation which can go wrong, with potentially devastating consequences. Having said that, in fact most airlines are risk-averse and there are, for example, very many systems, procedures, training courses, checklists and mandatory requirements which are all designed to minimise risk.
However, humans are ultimately responsible for the manufacture, maintenance and operation of aircraft, and for the overall management of the operation; and the one thing we know about humans is that unfortunately we can, and we will, make mistakes.
So, working from the premise that we want to minimise aviation incidents or accidents, it is clear that we need to address the possibility of human error. This leads us to Human Factors, and the concept of Threat and Error Management (TEM).
Then what is a threat?
A threat is anything from within the operation, or external to it, which can have a negative impact upon the operation. Threats may be known/anticipated or unknown/unexpected. Threats therefore are generally not ‘clear and present’ but are future-based.
The two key aspects to managing threats are:
- the need to understand, and to prepare, for threats which can be anticipated in the normal run of the operation.
- the ability to project ahead and to consider the possibility of unexpected threats which may impact the operation.
What about error management?
Given that error is ubiquitous, we can expect them to occur at any time, and at any phase, of the operation.
The two key aspects of managing error are:
- recognising the incipient onset of an error and preventing it from occurring or from further developing.
- at the point at which the error has actually occurred, either correcting it or mitigating the consequences of the error.
Having briefly outlined TEM we should now consider the implementation of the concept, and this is where the Human Factor comes into play. We have a number of ‘tools’ at our disposal and, within aviation, mandatory annual training (known as crew resource management) is required regarding these ‘tools’. Typically, the training will include subjects such as:
Communication Decision Making Teamwork
Leadership Stress Fatigue
Information Processing Human Error Personality
Attitudes & Behaviours Company Culture Situation Awareness
Standard Procedures Assertiveness Briefing
Training is interactive, discussion-based, company-specific, and case-based. To achieve this, we spend some time with a client to understand their needs, their issues and their objectives. The aim is for personnel, through self-assessment and critique, to modify their behaviour where beneficial, and to reinforce their existing desirable behaviours.
The understanding, and application, of these ‘tools’ can have a significant impact upon the safety and/or profitability of an airline.
But you may not be an airline, so what is the relevance for your company?
Well, you may be a high-risk business, and so you will be concerned about causing damage or injury to your clients’, or to your own property or personnel. In which case, you will be considering similar risks to an airline; although of course such risks will be of a different nature and context.
If your business is not of a type which creates such risks, then your primary concerns will be for efficiency and profitability.
In either case the Human Factor will have a direct impact upon your company, its safety where relevant, and its efficiency and profitability.
Mistakes can be very costly; they can reduce profitability and lead to the loss of customers.
So, your primary concerns, for example, should be to:
- Minimise expensive mistakes
- Ensure first class communication and decision making
- Create high performance teams
- Ensure your different teams interact effectively. Cross-functional teamworking
- Oversee compliance with your standard rules and procedures
- Reinforce an effective company culture
In other words, you need to manage all the Human Factors mentioned above!
To discuss your specific requirements, with no obligation, please enquire here.Read More
Etihad A380 Pilots Criticised For Crosswind Landing
There have been many crosswind landings as a result of the recent strong winds in the UK. One of the most difficult could have been the Etihad A380 landing at Heathrow Airport.
Perhaps the most worrying aspect was the angle at which the plane touches down, and the extent to which it makes adjustments after landing.
Some may have praised the pilots for this landing, but it seems Etihad commented internally that ‘this is not what we want to see’
Here is the video link: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2F2_OSUjcxDgwRead More
CRM course design and training for Flight Calibration Services
In October 2019 ITS was asked by Flight Calibration Services Limited (Flight-Cal), based at Shoreham in the UK, to provide support for CRM training. Flight-Cal specialise in flight inspections at airports worldwide.
Whenever possible, with any new client, ITS like to undertake a full Training Needs Analysis (TNA) before preparing, and commencing, any training programme. ITS consultants spent three days with Flight-Cal working with all departments, management and flight crew, building a clear understanding of the operation.
When the TNA was completed, the next phase was to design a 2-day initial CRM course that precisely matched the needs and particular issues for the Flight-Cal operation. Once the course was signed-off a training programme was established.
ITS delivered two initial CRM courses at the end of 2019, with more to follow on early in 2020.Read More
Train the Trainer for Tui Fly
At the beginning of October 2019, ITS returned to Amsterdam to run a train the trainer course for Tui Fly. The course was 3-day duration and was attended by six crew members who were preparing to become ground instructorsRead More
Thailand – Instructor Refresher Training
In early September 2019, ITS returned to Songkhla, Thailand to deliver a series of recurrent training courses to SFS Aviation instructors. SFS is a rotary wing operation serving mainly the offshore oil industry.
Having delivered initial instructor training courses in 2016, ITS now ran the following recurrent courses:
CRM Trainer Refresher
CRM Trainer Examiner Refresher
Assessment Skills for NOTECHS RefresherRead More
Human Performance & Limitations Instructor training for Tui Fly
During the week of August 5h 2019 ITS ran an HPL Instructor course in Amsterdam for Tui Fly instructors. The course follows the EASA ATPL syllabus and delivers the skills required for instructors to deliver HPL training to pilots and flight attendants. In particular, it enables flight attendant CRM trainers to meet the EASA requirement that they have attended such a course.Read More
Accident: Caspian MD83 at Mahshahr on Jan 27th 2020, overran runway on landing
| A Caspian Airlines McDonnell Douglas MD-83, registration EP-CPZ performing flight IV-6936 from Tehran Mehrabad to Mahshahr (Iran) with 144 people on board, landed on Mahshar’s runway 13 (landing distance available 2695 meters/8840 feet) at about 07:50L (04:20Z) but overran the end of the runway, broke through the airport perimeter fence and came to a stop on the Mahshahr-Sarbandar Expressway (96) about 170 meters past the end of the runway with all gear collapsed. |
The aircraft was evacuated while emergency services began to respond. There were no injuries, the aircraft received substantial damage.
Avianca A319, upset injures 8, on Jan 23rd 2020
|An Avianca Costa Rica Airbus A319-100, registration N703AV performing flight LR-693 from San Jose (Costa Rica) to Bogota (Colombia) with 108 passengers and 5 crew, was enroute at FL370 about 150nm southeast of Panama City (Panama) when the crew decided to divert to Panama City due to an upset causing injuries on board and a cockpit indication. The aircraft landed safely in Panama City about 30 minutes later. 6 Passengers and 2 cabin crew were attended to by paramedics.|
The airline reported the crew had received an alert on one of the aircraft systems. During the flight an abrupt movement of the aircraft occurred. The crew diverted to Panama City, 6 passengers and 2 cabin crew were treated by paramedics after landing in Panama City.
Mode-S data transmitted by the aircraft show the aircraft at FL370 at about 488 knots over ground as it crossed the coast into Colombia. Within a minute the aircraft turned about 25 degrees to the right and descended to below FL350, another minute later was in a significant climb above FL350 to near FL360 at 410 knots over ground, before settling on FL350 another minute later, the speed over ground continued to fluctuate between 412 and 516 knots until it settled at 449 knots about 6 minutes after the upset, when the aircraft had turned 180 degrees to the left and was on course to Panama City.
Passenger photos show a cabin ceiling cracked by impact, blood stains on the cabin ceiling, a destroyed lavatory and debris all across the cabin.
WestJet Q400 damaged by sharp de-rotation at Edmonton
Investigators have determined that a WestJet Encore Bombardier Q400 suffered damage at Edmonton after de-rotating sharply during a high-speed landing.
The Q400 – arriving from Fort McMurray on 19 July last year – had been approaching Edmonton’s runway 12 with storms in the vicinity of the airport.
Its captain opted for a high approach speed of 142kt, about 20kt above the reference, owing to the possibility of a missed approach and the risk of windshear. The crew also planned a “firm landing”, says the Transportation Safety Board of Canada, because of gusting conditions.
Flight-data recorder information shows the Q400 did not reduce speed before touchdown and the aircraft’s main landing-gear sensors briefly switched from ground mode, after touchdown, back to air mode.
The captain then made a full nose-down input to the control column, and the aircraft sharply de-rotated – by 10°/s rather than the typical 4°/s. This was followed by a “bang” and a nose-wheel shimmy, says the inquiry, and the aircraft pulled to the left during roll-out.
Analysis of flight-recorder data shows both the main and nose landing-gear switched to ground mode “nearly simultaneously”, it adds.While no hard landing was indicated to the pilots, they requested maintenance support after taxiing off the runway – although personnel could not attend for 45min owing to a lightning alert.
Both nose-gear tyres were changed before the aircraft taxied to the gate to disembark passengers. Further detailed inspection showed the aircraft had sustained substantial fuselage skin wrinkling on its nose as well as damage to the nose-gear door, nose-gear assembly, and forward bulkhead.
None of the 74 occupants was injured.
WestJet Encore’s operating manual states that crews should add half the gust factor – to a maximum of 10kt – to the normal approach speed when flying in gusting conditions.
This should have resulted in the Q400’s flying at 135kt, and reducing speed to the reference of 122kt at touchdown. The nose-wheel should then have been “promptly” brought into contact with the ground after the main-gear touchdown, says the inquiry.
It states that the damage to the aircraft (C-FKWE) occurred when the nose of the aircraft was lowered at a higher rate than normal, following the high-speed touchdown, and adds that the accident highlights the “importance of flight crews’ adhering to operational procedures and techniques”.Read More